Known exploited vulnerabilities by market cap
It’s easy to criticize vendors for the number of known exploited vulnerabilities in their software, but raw counts lack context. A company with 100 software products will naturally have more vulnerabilities than one with a smaller portfolio. However, product count alone doesn’t account for a company’s size or resources.
Microsoft is a prime example: as of this writing, it accounts for 311 entries in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog—25% of all entries. This is often dismissed because of Microsoft’s size and expansive product portfolio. However, a common counterpoint is that its scale affords the company more resources for product security than most.
How do we perform a simple comparison of product security effectiveness across organizations of various sizes, making different types of products for different types of customers? We use the great equalizer: United States Dollars.
Here’s how the CISA KEV leaderboard—specifically the 101 publicly traded companies with the most KEV entries—appears when normalized by market cap:
Vendor | KEVs | Market Cap (USD) | KEVs per $1B Market Cap |
---|---|---|---|
Adobe | 73 | $181,670,000,000 | 0.402 |
Cisco | 74 | $236,300,000,000 | 0.313 |
Fortinet | 15 | $70,890,000,000 | 0.212 |
Atlassian | 13 | $64,200,000,000 | 0.202 |
Microsoft | 311 | $3,090,000,000,000 | 0.101 |
Palo Alto Networks | 11 | $114,300,000,000 | 0.096 |
Oracle | 38 | $437,190,000,000 | 0.087 |
Samsung | 11 | $245,566,881,889 | 0.045 |
SAP | 11 | $323,720,000,000 | 0.034 |
73 | $2,330,000,000,000 | 0.031 | |
Apple | 77 | $3,510,000,000,000 | 0.022 |
D-Link | 20 | $404,068,003 | 0.000 |
Updated 2025-01-15 // Notes: Google = Google + Android; D-Link is a conversion from TWD; Samsung is a conversion from KRW
Nothing’s perfect, but this approach offers a fair way to compare product security effectiveness without relying on subjective or manipulatable criteria. A known exploited vulnerability represents an objectively poor security outcome. Using market cap as the denominator avoids debates over distinctions like product lines, software versions, platforms, and more.
-
Depending on when this was last updated, there may be more than 10 companies listed due to a tie. ↩